Legal Opinion

Bakeman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 11, 1974No. 72-257PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

The plaintiff, Alice Bakeman, sued the defendant, Sears, Roebuck and Company, to recover damages for personal injuries allegedy suffered in a fall on a patch of ice in defendant’s parking lot. Defendant appeals from a judgment of $6,000 entered on the jury verdict contending that the trial court should have directed a verdict for it at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. In the alternative, defendant claims that various trial errors and rulings on instructions require a new trial.

Evidence presented by the plaintiff and witnesses on her behalf showed that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Fitzsimons v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  3. Riccitelli v. SternfeldIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Zide v. Jewel Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. Sims v. BlockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. McCann v. Bethesda HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Lansing v. County of McLeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Eichler v. Plitt Theatres, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Lohan v. Walgreens Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API