Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Armstrong

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 3, 1978No. 80, September Term, 1978PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

The actors in this negligence litigation are two garbage truck operators (Spindler and Kemp), a motorcycle operator (Armstrong) and a motor vehicle operator (Wardlaw). The plaintiffs below were Armstrong and Wardlaw. After a jury trial in the Superior Court of Baltimore City they obtained judgments against Spindler and Kemp and their respective employers. Kemp and his employer’s motion for judgment n.o.v. was denied by the trial judge and they have appealed that ruling. Spindler and his employer have not appealed. 1 We now reverse the judgment against Kemp and his employer, Robb Tyler, Inc.

I

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Liberto v. HolfeldtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Devine v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Campbell v. JeniferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Dix v. SpampinatoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Yousef v. Trustbank Savings, F.S.B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Suburban Trust Co. v. WallerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. WraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  4. Myers v. BrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Ring v. PoelmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API