Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 11, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00173Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON RICHARD J. GIBSON, Petitioner, : Case No. 3:22-cv-173 - vs - District Judge Michael J. Newman Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz WARDEN, London Correctional Institution, : Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECUSAL This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by Petitioner Richard Gibson, is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion to Recuse (ECF No. 44). The Motion asks the Magistrate Judge to recuse himself and, in any event, motions for recusal are directed in the first instance to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API