Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1902No. Docket No. 21PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo; Adams, J. Case by Gardiner F. Snyder, administrator of the estate of Leo R. Snyder, deceased, against the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company, for negligently causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate. From a judgment in his favor for a part of the damages claimed, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In May, 1901, Leo R. Snyder, plaintiff’s intestate, was killed on a railroad crossing. Suit was *419brought, and a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff for $250. Plaintiff moved for a new trial. His motion was overruled. The case is brought here by the plaintiff by writ of error.

Two questions are involved: First. Did the judge err in his instructions to the jury in relation to the measure of damages ? Second. Did the judge err in refusing to grant a new trial because the amount of the verdict was inadequate? Before answering these questions, a brief statement of facts is necessary. At the time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hurst v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Rajnowski v. Detroit, Bay City & Alpena RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Elwood v. AddisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Wheeler v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Black v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Gorton v. HarmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Covell v. ColburnMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API