Legal Opinion

Scott's heirs v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 8, 1842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Chancery. Case 2. Case stated. Error to the Calloway Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

Samuel Soott having conveyed his land in Hickman county, in this State, to one of his sons, Larkin, the latter made an ostensible sale of it to his brother-in-law, Hugh M Clure, and removed to Memphis in Tennessee, leaving his aged father and mother in helpless destitution. M’Clure soon obtained forcible possession of the land; and thereupon Samuel Scott sued him and Larkin Scott in Chancery for a rescission, on the alledged ground of combination and fraud in procuring the conveyance, and also, because, as charged, the consideration was a verbal undertaking by Larkin, to-' live with his…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Glocke v. GlockeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Leach v. LeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Mott v. MottNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1891
  4. McClellan v. CoffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Thomas v. SweetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API