Legal Opinion
Hulva v. Arkansas State Board of Dental Examiners
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 22, 1982No. 82-109PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The State Board of Dental Examiners brought this suit to enjoin the appellant, Bob Hulva, from engaging in the practice of dentistry without a license. This appeal, which comes to us under Rule 29 (1) (a), is from a decree granting the injunction. For reversal it is argued that the governing statutes are unconstitutional for a number of reasons. We affirm the decree.
Hulva is not qualified to be licensed as a dentist, not having been to any medical or dental school or having graduated from high school. More than 20 years ago he worked for a few years in a dental…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Berry v. SummersIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Gosnell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Missionary Supporters, Inc. v. Ark. State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thompson v. SanfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Lacey v. Bekaert Steel Wire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Brazil v. Arkansas Board of Dental ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1984
- Ronald Lacey v. Bekaert Steel Wire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986