Legal Opinion

Mintz v. Tannous

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1991No. 61036PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal was filed, briefed and argued as an accelerated appeal pursuant to Loc.App.R. 25. The appellant timely appeals the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees and requests that this court review two assignments of error.

In compliance with App.R. 11.1, it is the opinion of the court that the evidence presented does not raise a genuine issue of any material fact; that in construing the evidence most favorably to the appellant, reasonable minds could only conclude that the appellant had presented no case for recovery; and that as a matter of law,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Williams v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 17 Mile, L.L.C. v. KruzelOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API