Legal Opinion

Solk v. Department of State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The purpose of the licensing provisions of article 12-A of the Real Property Law is “to assure by means of licensing competency and the observance of professional conduct on the part of real estate brokers and salesmen.” (Matter of Sullivan Co., 289 N. Y. 110, 114; Roman v. Lobe, 243 N. Y. 51, 54.) Petitioner held a representative broker’s license for the corporation, Charles Ford and Associates of the Bast. Ample evidence of improper and fraudulent practices and untrustworthiness on the part of the corporation, its agents and employees was adduced at appropriate hearings after due written…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roman v. LobeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Matter of Sullivan Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Matter of Harlem Check Cashing Corp. v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Smith v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  5. Harlem Check Cashing Corp. v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Galbreath-Ruffin Corp. v. 40th & 3rd Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Apostol v. Department of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  3. Matter of Malul v. New York Dept. of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API