United States v. Noble
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
In these cases, in response to a hypothetical question calling for such conclusion, plaintiffs’ medical experts testified that in their opinion the plaintiff was totally and permanently disabled before the expiration of his war risk insurance policy. This evidence was incompetent. United States v. Spaulding, 293 U. S. 498, 55 S. Ct. 273, 79 L. Ed. 617; United States v. Stephens (C. C. A.) 73 F.(2d) 695; United States v. White, 77 F.(2d) 757, decided by this court May 20, 1935; United States v. Harris (C. C. A.) 79 F.(2d) 341, decided September 9, 1935.
In each case the government objected to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936