Legal Opinion

United States v. Noble

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 13, 1935No. Nos. 7776, 7784, 7786PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In these cases, in response to a hypothetical question calling for such conclusion, plaintiffs’ medical experts testified that in their opinion the plaintiff was totally and permanently disabled before the expiration of his war risk insurance policy. This evidence was incompetent. United States v. Spaulding, 293 U. S. 498, 55 S. Ct. 273, 79 L. Ed. 617; United States v. Stephens (C. C. A.) 73 F.(2d) 695; United States v. White, 77 F.(2d) 757, decided by this court May 20, 1935; United States v. Harris (C. C. A.) 79 F.(2d) 341, decided September 9, 1935.

In each case the government objected to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API