Legal Opinion

Illinois State Chamber of Commerce v. Pollution Control Board

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1988No. 2-87-1143PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Unverzagt

When this case came on for oral argument, counsel for the parties presented this court a “Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Implementation of Settlement Agreement,” alleging that the parties have entered into compliance plans and that they needed until April 1989 to secure their approval from the Pollution Control Board and the Attorney General.

We deem this motion too little and too late. We are always pleased to receive settlement motions at an appropriate time. However, we remind counsel that the date of hearing is an inappropriate time to tender such motions.

When the date of hearing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Monsanto Co. v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31 v. Department of Central Management ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Granite City Division of National Steel Co. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Waste Management of Illinois, Inc. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Horsehead Resource Development Co. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Stepan Co. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API