Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. McDonough

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 21, 2006No. SC01-2252PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

951 So.2d 797 (2006)

Dan SCHMIDT, Petitioner,

v.

James R. McDONOUGH, etc., Respondent.

No. SC01-2252.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 21, 2006.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 2007.

Daniel Kevin Schmidt, pro se, Crestview, FL, for Petitioner.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Joy A. Stubbs, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondents.

2Per curiam

This case is before the Court on Dan Schmidt's petition for writ of mandamus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(8), Fla. Const. For reasons explained below, we deny the petition.

I. FACTS

Schmidt was convicted of a criminal offense and was…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Geffken v. StricklerSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. McNeil v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Vega v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Ralph A. Thomas v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. John v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Austin v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API