Legal Opinion
Geffken v. Strickler
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 1, 2001No. SC00-13PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
778 So.2d 975 (2001)
Richard Henry GEFFKEN, Petitioner,
v.
R.R. STRICKLER, etc., Robert K. Mathis, Judge, etc., and the State of Florida, Respondents.
No. SC00-13.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 1, 2001.
Richard Henry Geffken, Sanderson, FL, Petitioner, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
Petitioner Richard Henry Geffken petitions this Court for writ of quo warranto challenging his conviction and sentence.[1] We have jurisdiction to consider such petitions pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(8) of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- WFTV, Inc. v. WilkenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Ferenc v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Winthrop & Joseph, Inc. v. Marriott Resort Hospitality Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
4Cited by12 opinions
- Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Cason v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Johnson v. Office of State AttorneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Florida Parole Commission v. SpazianoSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Kemp v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.