Legal Opinion
Stines v. Hertz Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMark A. Costantino, J.
In this action for personal injuries and loss of services, the defendant, Iowa Car Rental, Inc., moves for an order vacating a warrant of attachment on the ground that no res or property of the defendant existed in the State of New York and for a further order setting aside and vacating the service of the summons and complaint pursuant to rule 3211 (subd. [a], pars. 8, 9) of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.
By way of a supplemental motion, the defendant moves for an order pursuant to section 6223 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules vacating or modifying the warrant of attachment on the ground…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Reserve Insurance v. China InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Bardons & Oliver, Inc. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Fishman v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Usdan v. Dunn Paper CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- Cocoline Chocolate Co. v. Hillside Enterprises, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- O'Connell v. Pincus (In re Our Distribution Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1990