Legal Opinion
Cocoline Chocolate Co. v. Hillside Enterprises, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Benjamin Brenner, J,
This is a motion by the corporate defendant to vacate an order of attachment pursuant to CPLB 6223 on the ground that, as to it, the plaintiff cannot succeed in the action.
The corporate defendant’s denial of liability for the goods sold relies essentially on (1) the agreement for the sale and purchase of the goods between the plaintiff and the individual defendant to which the corporate defendant was not a party;(2) plaintiff’s letter which states in part: “ We understand the business reasons for your doing business with the public as Hillside Enterprises, Inc., but as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Reserve Insurance v. China InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Bard-Parker Co. v. Dictograph Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Auerbach v. Grand National PicturesNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Miller Bros. Construction Co. v. Thew Shovel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Mirabella v. Banco Industrial de la Republica ArgentinaNew York Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank (Nat. Ass'n) v. Banque Intra, SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Worldwide Carriers, Ltd. v. Aris Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Marklin v. Drew Properties Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Belgian American Mercantile Corp. v. De Groeve-Marcotte & FilsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- National Bank & Trust Co. of North America, Ltd. v. J. L. M. International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.