Legal Opinion

Haley v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 14, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

There is a direct and cross-appeal in this case.

The direct appeal presents the question of whether the trial court allowed a sufficient amount to J. F. Haley for his services as engineer in making the preliminary survey of the road to be constructed and in estimating the cost of the improvement.

The cross-appeal presents the question of whether act 341 of the General Assembly, approved February 25, 1920, conflicts with § 28, article 7, of the Constitution of the State, by encroaching on the exclusive original jurisdiction of the county court over all matters relating to public roads in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wimberly v. Road Improvement District No. 7Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hiter v. Harahan Viaduct Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API