Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 14, 1989No. 88-1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court failed to provide any reasons for its downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. The defendant concedes, correctly, that a sentence which departs downward from the guidelines must be supported by written reasons as required by section 921.001(6), Florida Statutes (1987), and Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.701(b)(6) and 3.701(d)(ll). See State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Martinez, 534 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

The sentence is vacated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. State v. WaydaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. State v. VickeryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. State v. MartinezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ManghamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API