Legal Opinion

State v. Mangham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 11, 1989No. 88-2105Published

1Per curiam

Appellee concedes that the sentence must be reversed because the trial court failed to give written reasons to support a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. Dixon, 539 So.2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Martinez, 534 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

The sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. State v. WaydaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. State v. VickeryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. State v. MartinezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API