Legal Opinion

Town of Fairburn v. Brantley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 14, 1925No. 4851PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. “The general rule is that a supersedeas suspends all further proceedings in the suit in which the judgment superseded is rendered, such as are based upon and relate to the carrying into effect of that judgment.” Barnett v. Strain, 153 Ga. 43 (111 S. E. 574). Under this rule the supersedeas, during its pendency, prevents any steps to en*200force or carry into effect the judgment, such as issuing an execution based thereon. 3 O. J. 1319, § 1448.

No. 4851. October 14, 1925.

2. A motion for a new trial duly filed does not become automatically void because of failure to serve the respondent. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. NeilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Augusta Railway Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Barnett v. StrainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Hopkins v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  2. Tanner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Felker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Petty v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  5. Tyree v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API