Legal Opinion

Wright v. Smith

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 7, 1969No. 450-AppealPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a civil action brought to recover a real estate broker’s commission on an alleged contract which was not reduced to writing. The contract was purportedly entered into during April 1967, some five years after the enactment of P. L. 1962, chap. 162, now G. L. 1956, §9-1-4, as amended. It provides in pertinent part:

“No action shall be brought:
“Sixth. Whereby to charge any person upon any agreement or promise to pay any commission for or upon the sale of any interest in real estate.
“Unless the promise or agreement upon which such action shall be brought, or some note or memorandum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heyman v. Adeack Realty CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  2. Dooley v. LachutSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mutual Development Corp. v. Ward Fisher & Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  2. Peacock Realty Co. v. E. Thomas Crandall Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  3. Brochu v. SantisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  4. Maynes Real Estate, Inc. v. McPherronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. State Public Defender v. Iowa District Court for Woodbury CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API