Legal Opinion

AMEV Capital Corp. v. Kirk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 1992PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover on a guarantee of a promissory note, the defendants appeal from *776a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiFede, J.H.O.), entered March 20, 1990, which (1) set aside a deed dated July 23, 1979, from the defendant Richard Kirk to the defendant Janet M. Kirk, as a fraudulent conveyance, so as to restore ownership to those parties as it existed immediately prior to the execution of that deed, as tenants by the entirety, and (2) is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the sum of $853,504.64.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jo Ann Homes at Bellmore, Inc. v. DworetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Marine Midland Bank v. MurkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Savage v. . MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Polkowski v. MelaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. AMEV Capital Corp. v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. ConteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. United States v. McCombs-EllisonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1993
  4. Bradley v. KraemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Kendzia v. GregianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API