Legal Opinion

H.I.S.C, Inc. v. Franmar International Importers, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 22, 2020No. 3:16-cv-00480Unknown

1Opinion

FILED] 3 | OCT 32-2026 | . | crEeS DSTO COURT . | SOUTHERN DISTAICT OF CALIFORNIA | 6 . 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 __ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || 11 || H.LS.C., INC. and DEPALMA | Case No.: 3:16-cv-0480-BEN-WVG 12 || ENTERPRISES, INC., ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR 13 Plaintiffs, | (1) TREBLE DAMAGES (2) ATTORNEY’S FEES 14 Vs. 15 FRANMAR INTERNATIONAL [ECF Nos. 260, 261] 16 || IMPORTERS, LTD.; MARIA RAJANAYAGAM; and RAVI» 8 INDUSTRIES LIMITED, □ 19 Defendants. 20 21 Before the Court are Defendants Franmar International Importers, Ltd. and Maria 22 Rajanayagam’s (collectively,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. McCown v. City of FontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API