Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Norton
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon”) and Tosco Corporation (“Tosco”) seek reversal of the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”) decision dated September 5, 2000 and affirmance of Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Sweit-zer’s ruling regarding discovery dated January 9, 1998. The IBLA’s decision affirmed ALJ Sweitzer’s Order that Plaintiffs’ oil shale claims were null and void for failure to perform the required assessment work and refused to rule on ALJ Sweit-zer’s decision regarding discovery. Defendants oppose the appeal. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Andrus v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003