Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Greer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 2005PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s pro se petition for writ of habe-as corpus and application for appointment of counsel, filed October 29, 2003. Also before us is appellant’s application for relief, filed as a “Motion for Leave to Seek Recusal of York County District Attorney’s Office[,]” filed with this court October 20, 2004. Because appellant’s habeas corpus petition, which our legislature has subsumed within the ambit of the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546, constitutes, at a minimum, appellant’s fifth-attempt to obtain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. AlcornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrecksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. BurkettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Spanier v. FreehSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. In the Interest of C.O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Com. v. Armstrong, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API