Legal Opinion

Hajro v. Barrett

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 21, 2012No. C 10-1772 MEJPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL

MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Mirsad Hajro initiated this action on April 23, 2010, by filing a Petition pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c) seeking de novo review of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (“USCIS”) denial of his Form N-400 Application for Naturalization. Dkt. No. 1. On January 12, 2010, USCIS denied Plaintiffs naturalization application on the ground that Plaintiff gave false testimony with the intent to obtain an immigration benefit and consequently…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Yuen Jung v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blajro v. CitizenshipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. (PS) Starchyk v. US Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. Gonzalez Morales v. USCISDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  4. Mirsad Hajro v. UscisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Mirsad Hajro v. UscisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API