Hajro v. Barrett
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Mirsad Hajro initiated this action on April 23, 2010, by filing a Petition pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c) seeking de novo review of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (“USCIS”) denial of his Form N-400 Application for Naturalization. Dkt. No. 1. On January 12, 2010, USCIS denied Plaintiffs naturalization application on the ground that Plaintiff gave false testimony with the intent to obtain an immigration benefit and consequently…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Yuen Jung v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blajro v. CitizenshipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- (PS) Starchyk v. US Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Gonzalez Morales v. USCISDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
- Mirsad Hajro v. UscisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Mirsad Hajro v. UscisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016