Legal Opinion

Industrial Indemnity v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1990No. D011151PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

Insurer Industrial Indemnity (Industrial) seeks extraordinary relief after the court denied its motion for summary judgment in this action brought by insured Gary Kaku (Kaku). Relying on Northwestern Title Security Co. v. Flack (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 134 [85 Cal.Rptr. 693], the court ruled Industrial must show substantial prejudice from Kaku’s late notice of a claim made against him. We distinguish this case from the circumstances reviewed in Northwestern Title Security Co. v. Flack, supra, and grant the petition because under the unambiguous terms of the policy, coverage existed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northwestern Title Security Co. v. FlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. People v. WatkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Hillman v. Leland E. Burns, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Greene v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Michael Shaw, and Fred L. Arthur v. City of Sacramento Sacramento Police Department Joseph Serna Arturo Venegas, Jr., ChiefCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Alameda Produce Market, Inc. v. Air Nail Co. (In Re Air Nail Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
  4. KPFF, Inc. v. California Union InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Lat v. Farmers New World Life Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API