Legal Opinion
Lorenz Diversified Corp. v. Falk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 23, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover on a promissory note, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (O’Rourke, J.), dated June 22, 2006, which, upon a decision of the same court dated May 18, 2006, made after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $35,268.56.
Ordered that the judgement is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly awarded judgment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff established a prima facie case by submitting proof of the existence of a promissory note and the defendants’ default (see Marinis v Scherr, 306…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anand v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Panasuk v. Viola Park Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Consentino v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Hershkowitz v. MichelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Central Islip Cooperative G. L. F. Service, Inc. v. TsantesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Levien v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ping Ji v. MalikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Green Apple Management Corp. v. AronisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Singotiko v. KenealyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011