Legal Opinion

Stockgrowers and Ranchers Bank of Reno v. Milisich Et Ux

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1930No. 2767 (See 52 Nev. 178)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Appellant filed a petition for rehearing and in addition filed what is designated "Appellant's Closing Brief on Petition for Rehearing." Respondents filed a brief in reply to this. These briefs were filed without leave and in contravention of rule XV of this court which prescribes that no other argument shall be heard on a motion for a rehearing except such as may be contained in the petition therefor and the reply to said petition. In Rickey v. Douglas, 45 Nev. 341, we ruled that no other argument was permissible. We are always desirous of a full argument on an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hynes v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Rickey v. Douglas Milling & Power Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Boole v. BooleWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CejaNevada Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API