Legal Opinion

Zeiger v. Pennsylvania R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Law. On demurrer to declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

EWING, District Judge.

The plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the city of Zenta, Kingdom of Hungary, and in this action seeks to recover damages by virtue of the provisions of the acts of 1851 and 1855 of this commonwealth, for the death of his son, George Zeiger, late a resident of Pittsburgh, Pa., which was occasioned by a collision while the said decedent was a passenger on a train of the defendant company en route from New York to Pittsburgh. The train in which the said George Zeiger was a passenger collided with another train of cars of the defendant company at or near Harrisburg,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Railroad Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Patek v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Anustasakas v. International Contract Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Zeiger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
  4. Fulco v. Schuylkill Stone Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  5. Fulco v. Schuylkill Stone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API