Legal Opinion

State v. Tipka

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1984No. 83-793PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.

R.C. Chapter 1509 provides a number of duties and prohibitions regarding the operation of oil and gas wells and sets forth a variety of enforcement procedures and sanctions to ensure compliance. Appellees were charged with violating R.C. 1509.22, which provided in pertinent part at the time relevant herein:

“Contamination of surface or underground water by substances resulting, obtained, or produced in connection with exploration, drilling, or *259producing of oil or gas is prohibited * * *. All water produced from a weil shall be injected in a manner and into an underground formation approved by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. United States v. Frezzo Brothers, Inc., Guido Frezzo, and James L. FrezzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris v. Van HooseOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Personal Service Insurance v. MamoneOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Simmers, Chief, Div. of Oil & Gas Resources Mgt. v. N. RoyaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. TownsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Paul Adams Coal Co. v. MamoneOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API