Legal Opinion
State v. Tipka
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1984No. 83-793PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.
R.C. Chapter 1509 provides a number of duties and prohibitions regarding the operation of oil and gas wells and sets forth a variety of enforcement procedures and sanctions to ensure compliance. Appellees were charged with violating R.C. 1509.22, which provided in pertinent part at the time relevant herein:
“Contamination of surface or underground water by substances resulting, obtained, or produced in connection with exploration, drilling, or *259producing of oil or gas is prohibited * * *. All water produced from a weil shall be injected in a manner and into an underground formation approved by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Frezzo Brothers, Inc., Guido Frezzo, and James L. FrezzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harris v. Van HooseOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Personal Service Insurance v. MamoneOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Simmers, Chief, Div. of Oil & Gas Resources Mgt. v. N. RoyaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. TownsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Paul Adams Coal Co. v. MamoneOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.