Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kinsey v. Kellogg

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1884No. 8,995PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Humboldt. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.

February 28, 1876, the following legislative act was approved by the governor: —

“ Section 1. The county clerk of Humboldt shall receive for all services required of him as county clerk and ex-officio clerk of the District Court, Probate Court, board of supervisors, board of equalization, auditor, and ex-officio county recorder, a salary of $5,000 per annum, which salary shall be in full for all services required of and performed by him, and it shall be paid monthly out of the county treasury. He shall collect and safely keep all fees of whatever kind or nature allowed him by law for services…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Anderson v. DurickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Howell v. LaGraveNevada Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Swinnerton v. Monterey CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People Ex Rel. Smith v. GunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. San Luis Obispo County v. DarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State Ex Rel. Cutting v. LaGraveNevada Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API