Legal Opinion
Shokal v. Dunn
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1985No. 15227PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
On December 21, 1978, respondent Trout Co. applied for a permit to appropriate 100 c.f.s. of waters from Billingsley Creek near Hagerman, Idaho. Numerous protests were filed by local residents, property owners, and Billingsley Creek water users. The Department of Water Resources (Water Resources) held a hearing on the application on April 24, 1979, and issued Permit No. 36-7834 on November 14, 1979, pursuant to an order of that same date. This order was subsequently amended on December 21, 1979. •
Some of the protestants, including the petitioners and appellants here, sought…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Kootenai Environmental Alliance, Inc. v. Panhandle Yacht Club, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Tanner v. Bacon, State EngineerUtah Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- William F. West Ranch, LLC v. TyrrellWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Dovel v. DobsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Hitchcock & Red Willow Irrigation District v. Lower Platte North Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.