Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Columbia Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, * District Judge.
Defendant City of Columbia (“Columbia”) moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), on the ground that it is exempt from liability under the federal antitrust laws and immune under state law. Plaintiff (“Omni”) alleges that defendants have violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 & 2, and state law.
The allegations of the complaint, which we accept as true on this motion to dismiss, are as follows:
Omni is a Georgia corporation engaged in erecting billboards and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Community Communications Co. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.