Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Insurance v. Warbritton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1903No. 12,853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Anderson district court; 0. A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J. :

Action was brought before a justice of the peace to recover for a loss occasioned by a fire under a policy of insurance issued by the plaintiff in error to the defendant in error. The answer in that court contained a general denial and a special defense that the property insured had been sold and conveyed in violation of one of the conditions of the policy. The clause of the policy containing that provision was as follows :

“If the interest of the assured be or become other than the entire, unconditional, unencumbered and sole ownership…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. British America Assurance Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Febert v. Upland Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. German American State Bank v. BaddersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Ward v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API