Legal Opinion

Barnes v. McKay

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1855PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGookins, J.

This was a bill in chancery by McKay and wife against Jane Barnes and others, setting forth the following facts:

*302One Richard Bundren, who, in his lifetime, owned an eighty acre tract of land, died, leaving the appellant, Jane Barnes, his only heir at law. She married Nathaniel Ba/rnes, by whom she had issue thirteen children, of whom the wife of McKay is one. The other twelve are made defendants. Nathaniel Barnes, in his lifetime, owned an eighty acre tract, and two forty acre tracts, all adjoining the Bundren tract, of which he died seized. After his death, in 1847, Isom Ba/rnes, one of his…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Robbins v. MageeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pitcher v. DoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Berry v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Reid v. State ex rel. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API