Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Bernard

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 28, 2013No. 11-4054PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge THACKER wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge SHEDD joined. Judge DIAZ wrote a dissenting opinion.

OPINION

THACKER, Circuit Judge:

Michael Defonte Bernard (“Appellant”) appeals the district court’s decision allowing him to represent himself at trial despite his questionable mental capacity. Appellant contends that the Supreme Court’s decision in Indiana v. Edwards, 554 U.S. 164, 128 S.Ct. 2379, 171 L.Ed.2d 345 (2008), established the broad legal principle that once a borderline competent defendant seeks to represent himself at trial, the district court…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. Benjamin Stanley, Rufus Paul HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Charles Barefoot, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Dylann RoofCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  4. People v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. United States v. Phillip DuctanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API