Johnson v. Indopco, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge:
Before the court is the motion of defendant Indopco, Inc., d/b/a Unichema North America (“Unichema”) to dismiss. For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
This action involves two black female employees of Unichema who allege that Uniche-ma engaged in unlawful employment practices. 1 Plaintiff Iona E. Johnson (“Johnson”), a current employee of Unichema, began working for Unichema on November 14,1988 as a secretary. Johnson consistently received high job performance evaluations from her superiors. In November…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Linda Place, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Abbott Laboratories, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Whitehead v. AM International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Johnson v. Indopco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Fernando v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Rheams v. Marquette UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.