Duskin v. Department of Human Services
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant, Department of Human Services (the Department or the DHS), appeals by leave granted the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary disposition and certifying a class of plaintiffs who are males of African-American, Hispanic, Arab, and Asian racial and ethnic backgrounds who work for the Department (the minority males). Because the minority males have not established the requirements of class certification, we reverse.
I. FACTS
A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This Court summarized the background facts of this case in our previous opinion:
*648In this disparate treatment, employment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Henry v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Zine v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- A & M SUPPLY CO. v. Microsoft Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carlos Bell v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Erma Rogers Revocable Trust v. Erickson Retirement CommunitiesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Laurie Breiner v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
- Marlon Carter v. Michigan State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Platt Convenience Inc v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.