Legal Opinion
Terrebonne, Ltd. of California v. Murray
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 23, 1998No. CIV-F-95-5296 OWW DLBPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AGAINST FORMER ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND LAW FIRMS FOLLOWING DISQUALIFICATION FROM FURTHER REPRESENTATION OF PLAINTIFF; AND ORDER
WANGER, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against attorneys Kenneth S. Bayer, Timothy D. McCollum and the law firms of McCollum, Bayer & Bunch, and Bayer, Cut-singer & Lopez, 1 following disqualification of these lawyers and their law firms as attorneys of record for plaintiff Terrebonne Ltd. of…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- (HC) Newbery v. CovelloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Delivery Financial Services LLC v. Lemberg Law LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Goldstein v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Malherek v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- McCurley v. Royal Seas Cruises, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020