Legal Opinion

Mostella v. N & N MOTORS

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 12, 2002No. 1010121PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deborah Mostella appeals from a final judgment dismissing her action against N N Motors1 and Shane Nunn. The trial court dismissed the action with prejudice because it concluded that Mostella's claims were subject to arbitration. We reverse and remand.

In October 2000, Mostella visited N N Motors in Rainbow City to purchase a used vehicle. Shane Nunn, described by Mostella as a "salesperson and partner" at N N Motors, assisted Mostella in her purchase. Mostella ultimately decided to purchase a used 1989 Nissan Maxima automobile that Nunn showed her; she was using a 1987 Cadillac DeVille…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. TranSouth Financial Corp. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Sisters of Visitation v. COCHRAN PLASTERING CO. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Rogers Foundation Repair, Inc. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Tefco Finance Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Southern United Fire Ins. Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wolff Motor Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Potts v. Baptist Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. LarkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Johnson v. Jefferson County Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Cook's Pest Control, Inc. v. RebarSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API