Legal Opinion

Wolff Motor Co. v. White

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 2003No. 1011845PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolff Motor Company, Pete Wolff III, and Joe Powell (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Wolff") appeal from the trial court's denial of their motion to compel arbitration of the claims filed against them by Stephen M. White and Linda K. White. The trial court denied Wolff's motion to compel arbitration on the ground that the Whites' purchase from Wolff of a vehicle used to transport automobiles did not substantially affect interstate commerce. We reverse and remand.

Wolff Motor Company buys vehicles in Florida, Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia, and Mississippi and resells them to buyers in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Security Pest Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Service Corp. Intern. v. FulmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Title Max of Birmingham, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Custom Performance, Inc. v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Edward D. Jones & Co., LP v. VenturaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API