Legal Opinion
Nase v. Teco Energy, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 3, 2004No. CIV.A. 04-0838PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
VANCE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs move the Court to remand the action to state court. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the plaintiffs’ motion.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 17, 2004, Michael Nase, Beverly Nase, and Glen Wilson sued four groups of defendants in state court. One group consists of Michael Nase’s and Glen Wilson’s former employers: Teco Energy, Inc., TODCO Management Services, Inc., Transocean Offshore U.S.A., Inc., Trans-ocean Offshore Ventures, Inc., The Offshore Drilling Company, and Cliffs Drilling Company. The second group includes drilling…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunet v. United Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Travis v. IrbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jack v. Evonik CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Moore v. Bis Salamis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2010
- Cambre v. Union Carbide CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Ellis v. Evonik CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022