Legal Opinion

Broomberg v. Hudgens

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1991No. A91A0767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Presiding Judge.

Appellee-defendants in this “slip and fall” action filed separate motions for summary judgment, relying upon Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc., 256 Ga. 27 (343 SE2d 680) (1986). The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of both appellees and appellant-plaintiffs appeal from those orders.

Prophecy Corp. provides that “[w]here a respondent offers self-contradictory testimony on motion for summary judgment, such testimony will be construed against him unless a reasonable explanation is offered for the contradiction. [Cit.]” Boyd v. Garden Center, 197 Ga.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Rossano v. American Legion Post No. 29Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Boyd v. Garden Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Slaton MacHine Sales, Inc. v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hudgens v. BroombergSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  2. Broomberg v. HudgensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Hudgens v. BroombergSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API