Broomberg v. Hudgens
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Presiding Judge.
Seeking to recover for injuries sustained as the result of her slip and fall, appellant-plaintiff and her husband filed the instant action against appellee-defendants. Appellees filed separate motions for summary judgment and, relying upon Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc., 256 Ga. 27 (343 SE2d 680) (1986), they urged that certain testimony given by appellant in the instant tort action did not comport with the testimony that had been given by her in a previous workers’ compensation proceeding. Appellees’ motions were granted and appellants appealed. We reversed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Alterman Foods, Inc. v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Grier v. JEFFCO MANAGEMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Alterman Foods, Inc. v. MunfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Hudgens v. BroombergSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lindsey v. J. H. Harvey Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Department of Human Resources v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Gourley v. Food Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Taylor & Mathis, Inc. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Stockstill v. Prime Foods System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.