Howell v. Howell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Appellant’s main contention is that the trial judge should have submitted the issue of constructive abandonment and should have instructed the jury on this issue. We agree. The primary ground of appellant’s original action and the counterclaim to her husband’s action for an absolute divorce is constructive abandonment. Evidence presented at the trial tended to show: Prior to the separation, Mr. Howell on several occasions had beaten Mrs. Howell, and threatened to kill her; that on the night of 13 December 1972, he severely beat her with his fist and she left the next morning out…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paris v. Carolina Portable Aggregates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Panhorst v. PanhorstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Nebel v. NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Kinney v. GoleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Harrison v. McLearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Rental Towel & Uniform Service v. Bynum International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981