Legal Opinion

Hawley v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 12, 1894No. Appeal, No. 23PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 23, Jan. T., 1894, by defendants, Joseph H. Hampton and George J. Humbert, from order of C. P. Montgomery Co., Oct. T., 1893, No. 2, setting aside appraisement under exemption law. Motion to set aside appraisement under exemption laws.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 23, Jan. T., 1894, by defendants, Joseph H. Hampton and George J. Humbert, from order of C. P. Montgomery Co., Oct. T., 1893, No. 2, setting aside appraisement under exemption law. Motion to set aside appraisement under exemption laws. The facts appear by the following opinion, by Weand, J. : “ The plaintiff is a holder of a note which reads as follows: “ ‘ Norristown, Pa., Dec. 1, 1892. “ ‘ Four months after date we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of S. D. Hawley, at First National Bank of Norris-town, Norristown, Pa., seven thousand dollars without defalcation, for…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge of the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. HamlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. In re KolberDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Bohlander v. Collins, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1950
  4. Nissley v. Heller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1931
  5. Suker v. ConnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API