Legal Opinion

Garrison v. Finks

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 30, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The Superior Court (Cumberland County) denied on October 27,1983, defendants’ motion to dismiss this medical malpractice action on the basis of the statute of limitations. Both defendants filed timely notices of appeal to this court. On plaintiff’s motion, we dismiss those appeals because the Superior Court’s ruling was plainly interlocutory and not reviewable until a final judgment had been rendered. See Field, McKusick & Wroth, Maine Civil Practice § 73.1, at 432-33 (1981 Supp.); 15 C. Wright, A. Miller & E. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure 537-38 (1976). Cf. Joyce v. Conary, 317 A.2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,575 Paulette Papilsky v. Alvin H. Berndt, Harry Levine v. Robert S. DriscollCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Joyce v. ConarySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Maine State Employees Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. Porrazzo v. KarofskySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Brickyard Associates v. Auburn Venture PartnersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. Kirkpatrick v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. HCI Corp. v. Voikos Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API