Legal Opinion

Husbands v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 19, 1873Published

APPEAL PROM McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.

Opinion by

Judge Peters':

We propose to present our understanding of the authorities referred to in the petition for a rehearing, and to ascertain the analogy between the cases if there be any.

*312The first case is Burk et al. v. Chrisman et al., 3 B. Mon. 50. Burk purchased a tract of land and gave his bonds for the price with Chrisman and Crozier as his sureties. He afterwards sold out the land in different parcels to several persons, a distinct portion to each, left the state, and became insolvent. His sureties paid the original price of the land to his vendor, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dickey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  2. Burk v. ChrismanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1842
  3. Oldham v. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1843
  4. Beall v. BarclayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1850

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API