Legal Opinion

Burk v. Chrisman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 14, 1842PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Chancery. Case 14. The ease stated. Error to the Jessamine Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

Under a decretal sale of a tract of land, in which an express lien was reserved as collateral security for the price, one Willis Burk bought the land, and gave his bonds for the consideration, with Chrisman and Crozier as his sureties. Burk having afterwards sold the land to several persons — a distinct portion to each¡ left the State, and became insolvent, and his said sureties having been compelled to pay the amount of the bonds for the original price, filed a bill in Chancery claiming an equitable substitution, and an enforcement of the lien reserved as aforesaid, to the original creditors…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lewis' Admr. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Zook v. ClemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Dickey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  4. Fishback v. Bodman & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
  5. Bank of Hopkinsville v. RudyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API