Legal Opinion

Swanigan v. American National Red Cross

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 1993No. 23961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

Pursuant to Rule 228, SCACR, the following question has been certified to this court by the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina:

Is an action against a blood collection agency for negligent collection, processing, and supplying of allegedly contaminated blood, including the health history screening of voluntary blood donors and the testing of their blood, governed by the statute of limitations and repose for medical malpractice actions codified in S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-545, or by the general statute of limitations for negligence actions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silva v. Southwest Florida Blood Bank, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Wright Ex Rel. Green v. Colleton County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Doe v. American National Red CrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Cackowski v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Shaw v. Caldor, Inc., No. Cv940135645 (Feb. 23, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  4. Cackowski v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Williams v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API