Legal Opinion

Austin v. McShane

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1926No. 3301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above). When the banking commissioner took charge of the insolvent bank for the purpose of liquidating its affairs, he acquired only such rights as to the notes sued upon as the bank had against the makers thereof. Brady v. Cobbs (Tex. Civ. App.) 211 S. W. 802; Hall v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 255 S. W. 506; Chapman v. Clark (Tex. Civ. App.) 262 S. W. 161; King v. Wise (Tex. Com. App.) 282 S. W. 570; Austin v. Sisk (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 535. These notes were renewals of the note for $6,758.90 made by N. A. Shaw and the appellees other than Mrs.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. King v. WiseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. StraussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. BradySupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co. v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abrams v. Ross' EstateTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Perez v. Houston & T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. International-Great Northern R. R. v. LowryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Schneider v. DelavanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API